ELECTRIC TIBET J. Doukas First Edition 1969 SAN FRANCISCO Psychedelic Rock
    130
  $   151   

 


€ 130   (best offer accepted)   Sold For
Mar 10, 2024 Sold Date
Mar 6, 2024 Start Date
1 Number Of Bids
  Germany Country Of Seller
eBay Sold at
 
save auction  

Description

THE LITERARY UNDERGROUND OF THE GRATEFUL DEAD: ELECTRIC TIBET


“You gotta experience the Grateful Dead. When they happen, they just happen. You can’t get it by reading about them. You have to freak with them” (7). So begins one of the more obscure books on the San Francisco music scene, Electric Tibet. Published in April 1969, the book was more than simply an early journalistic exploration of the city’s burgeoning music scene: it was also the first detailed monograph on the Haight-Ashbury written by a sympathetic insider, James N. Doukas. Although not exclusively focused on the Dead, they are a major presence throughout, and the author credits them as both musical heroes and community leaders. The Dead’s centrality in the narrative, along with the book’s obscurity, make Electric Tibet a fine example of what this blog explores.


The book’s status owes much to the circumstances of its publication. Issued by a pornographic book publisher, it had only one printing, and was quickly eclipsed by Ralph J. Gleason’s The Jefferson Airplane and the San Francisco Sound, which appeared later that year. That is a shame, for the book was a serious effort: Doukas spent the better part of a year interviewing and writing, and his approach drew on his skills as a journalist as well as his training in sociology at UC Santa Barbara. That training gives the book some of its appeal. Doukas studied with sociologist Howard Boughey, whom he credits for encouraging him to write the book. Boughey is known for his textbook, Insights in Sociology: An Introduction, but it is his theory that “social organization is voluntarily constructed by social participants” that made him an ideal mentor for Doukas. Boughey’s Ordinary Social Occasions, Sandcastles, and Structural Reproduction: A Sociology of Everybody’s Social Life presents that theory, and it clearly informs Doukas’s approach, though Boughey’s book would not appear until much later. Doukas’s emphasis on the musicians as a way of approaching the larger Haight-Ashbury community can be seen as an early application of Boughey’s theory, and it makes Electric Tibet a useful text for readers interested in the literature on the Haight-Ashbury and on the San Francisco music scene.


For Doukas, the interviews are the heart of the book; as he explains, “A lot of the big-name weekly magazines had attempted to interpret the history of the history of San Francisco rock music. But … no one had asked the musicians themselves to explain what they had been going through. What I wanted to do was to collect ideas from as many of them as I could and, in the course of the interviews, to gain an understanding of this unique American sub-culture” (9). Doukas also talked to a wide range of other narrators, from fellow rock fans and Haight-Ashbury hippies to even the housekeeper for Blue Cheer. His distillation of so many stories and perspectives is Electric Tibet’s greatest strength.


The book’s 191 pages are divided into 14 chapters, six of which outline his larger argument: the first three provide a history of the scene and the last three offer an assessment and thoughts on what the future may bring. Chapters on Big Brother and the Holding Company, the Airplane, Moby Grape, and Country Joe and the Fish provide platforms for Doukas to consider larger issues of success, the impact of media, and the influence of the recording industry; in part because he interviewed thoughtful musicians, his conclusions are balanced, and he avoids ideological polemics. One of the most interesting chapters is on Ron Polte, manager of Quicksilver Messenger Service and the Ace of Cups, among others; Doukas also interviewed former Prankster Julius Karpen, who managed Big Brother, as well as ballroom impresarios Bill Graham and Chet Helms, giving the book a breadth of perspectives on the scene. That is one of Electric Tibet’s best features, for it captures a good swath of the burgeoning local industry that had already enveloped what had begun as a quiet artists’ bohemia.


Doukas’s central argument is that the Haight functioned as a real community, with the musicians providing both the primary artform as well as the main economic engine. Ralph J. Gleason makes the same point in his book, but Doukas sees more change and instability in the scene, and greater challenges ahead. Those elements would receive even more emphasis in later accounts, with recording contracts labeled as artistic compromise and loss of innocence; Doukas manages to document the pressures of success and visibility but presents them as inherent dangers, seeing them as organic byproducts of capitalism to be addressed and navigated, not condemned in the conspiracy-addled paranoia that also swirled through the scene.


Although Deadheads might wish for more of a focus on the Dead, the band has a strong presence throughout, and Doukas records a number of his interactions with them. He spent time with several band members and associates, chiefly Rock Scully, whom he singles out for his help, and he even sought out one of the Dead’s more unusual performances, at San Quentin on March 7, 1968. Doukas also makes plain his admiration and respect for their music, and thanks Phil Lesh for a number of key insights and useful observations. That may have been all of the access Doukas could get: by 1968 the Dead were working hard, and often out of town. But the book does give a good sense of the Dead shortly after their Haight-Ashbury heyday, and Doukas provides a good accounting of how the broader Haight-Ashbury community informed the Dead’s project, and identity.


Electric Tibet is a respectable first book, especially for a young writer, but it did not inaugurate its author’s career as a music journalist. Aside from a few articles in student newspapers, the book represents the only sustained music criticism that Doukas wrote. Nor did it leave much of a mark, whether due to the publisher’s notoriety or to the book’s limited distribution. There are flaws: although the copy-editing is surprisingly good, the book has its errors, some painful- -Mountain Girl is “Mountain Grow” (24), for example. But the book’s critical reception, or lack thereof, probably owes more to the shady distribution network that Dominion relied on, which was not aimed at rock fans. And by the time the book appeared, Doukas was already pursuing photography seriously: he met Ansel Adams in 1967, the first of several famous photographers he sought out, and he had his first gallery exhibition only two years later. He went on to have a distinguished career as a photographer, teaching and even hosting dinner lectures by Ansel Adams and Imogen Cunningham, among others. In 1980 he was commissioned by the Saudi government to design the University of Riyadh photography complex. Today he divides his time between California and Spain, and he still maintains a studio in the Bay Area, continuing to teach and train young photographers.


Not surprisingly, Electric Tibet has never been widely cited, but it holds up remarkably well for such an early effort. Doukas’s distinction between the first and second phases of the San Francisco music scene was perceptive, and he did a fine job of capturing the argot of the time without condescending to his narrators. Some of his assessments have held up well: his appreciation of the Dead’s and the Airplane’s musical prowess, the intelligence of their lyrics and the ambition of their compositions, was prescient; his estimation of the enduring significance of Country Joe and the Fish and Moby Grape, less so. But Doukas’s careful delineation of the different currents in the scene, his descriptions of the contributions by native musicians and immigrant bands are sound, and the book’s status as a contemporary document means that it merits attention. Though not without its flaws and errors, Electric Tibet is a credible effort for a young writer who was anxious to provide a corrective to the incomprehending hype and dismissive condescension that characterized much of the mainstream media coverage of the Haight-Ashbury and the San Francisco music scene. As the shelf of books on the Dead grows ever longer, it is easy to lose sight of the larger artistic milieu that informed their genesis; Electric Tibet is an interesting, useful contemporary account, and a thought-provoking, unheralded entry in the library of the Dead.





In 1969, San Francisco's eminent jazz critic Ralph J. Gleason's


book on San Francisco rock appeared, perhaps the best book written on the


scene in the Sixties. A little known book was rushed into print before


Gleason's book came out, doubtless to capitalize on Gleason's advance


press. The rival turned out to be one of the least known and most


interesting books written on the early years of the San Francisco sound,


with the wonderful title Electric Tibet.




By 1968, the San Francisco scene had already achieved international


fame and notoriety, both as one of the urban linch-pins of youth culture


and the birthing ground of one of the most definable bodies of rock music.


That year witnessed the meteoric rise to headliner stature of the last of


the first five major bands, Big Brother and the Holding Company, and hard


on their heels were a second wave of bands who looked poised to do even


greater things, such as Santana.





Doukas was a journalism major at UC Santa Barbara, who decided to


write the book at the urging of a professor who said "why don't you do it?"


He establishes the context for his interviews with his early comment, "the


hippie movement had been blown up and stepped on by the mass media, but I


had a feeling that its music was a lot deeper and more complex than people


realized." And the rest of the book bears that out.





Though Doukas knows the music and discusses albums and songs in


detail, much of the text reads like lightly-edited interview transcript,


which is its strength and weakness. Most of what is said will be familiar


to fans of the music. There are some interesting variations in some of


these anecdotes: it is odd to see some musicians downplaying events that


would later become common knowledge--such as the Dead's firing of Pigpen and


Bob Weir, or Moby Grape's self-inflicted difficulties. But for the most


part, what is presented as quoted material here jibes with other known


interview sources, such as Bruce Harrah-Conforth's excerpts in his Ph.D.


dissertation "The Rise and Fall of an American Folk Community," or in Joel


Selvin's book Summer of Love, which was also built around extensive


interviews.





The most unusual interview in the volume is Ron Polte, who lapsed


into virtual media silence in the years following; the longest interview is


with Chicken Hirsh, the drummer for Country Joe and the Fish, while the


band was on tour in Canada. It is a snapshot of the era, replete with


Sixties trappings, expressions, and a clear-headed explication of the


forces at work on that band and in the scene overall.





In general, Doukas writes well and thoughtfully; there are


stylistic problems, perhaps the worst being his habit of dropping


spliced-in criticism at the end of quotations that make the preceding seem


inevitable. To a large extent, though, this goes with the territory; and if


viewed as a sourcebook and not a synthesis or history, I think it looks


fairly good. The central narrative value of the work as a whole is that it


provides a useful snapshot of the scene in flux, with bands making their


break and others breaking up, and all coming to grips with their own


involvement in the industry of popular music with all its attendant


implications.





If Tibet had been published by a major house, it would have become


one of the indispensable titles in every San Francisco rock fan's library;


that is, after all, a slender library. As it is, Tibet turns up only on the


shelves of the fortunate and the serious collectors. This is a function not


of its content, but of its odd publishing history. Dominion was a


pornographic book publisher, whose bread-and-butter was the cheap paperback


with lurid covers and graphic, suggestive titles. But like many porno


publishers in the Sixties, they put out non-porn titles that they in some


way believed in, or perhaps hoped would lend a little mainstream


respectability. A local rare book dealer in San Francisco, Red House Books,


believes that this sort of project was probably the brainchild of one


editor, or since Doukas attended Santa Barbara, perhaps he had some


personal connection with a sympathetic backer at Dominion who would have


seen it through. Unfortunately, Dominion folded years ago and Doukas did


not pursue a career




price rating